| A Global Forum for Naval
Historical Scholarship |
International Journal of Naval History |
| Home Mission & Structure Editorial Board Archives Submissions Letters Site Map |
| Previous
Page PDF
“Hell
was let loose”: Making Order from Confusion: The
July
1945 Karl
James Australian
War Memorial The
Royal Australian Navy (RAN) participated in more than 20 amphibious
operations in the south Pacific during the Second World War. The largest
of these assaults was at Coming
ashore in the first waves were the officers and ratings of the RAN Beach
Commandos. These men were specialists, who were trained in assault
techniques and were responsible for controlling the successive waves of
landing craft – they helped order the confusion of a landing into an
organised beachhead, and they would help the infantry defend it. They
also had to work closely with the army, if they were established control
of the littoral. This paper will look at the evolution of Australian’s
amphibious operations during the Second World War, the creation of the
RAN Beach Commando and their subsequent participation in the Australian
landing at Dr
Karl James began working at the Australian War Memorial, Canberra, at
the start of 2006 where is the historian in the Military History
Section. Karl completed his PhD at the University of Wollongong,
Wollongong, where he also lectured and tutored in Australian history and
worked as a research assistant. During 2005 he was an intern at the The
July
1945 Dr Karl James On
morning of 1 July 1945 warships from the United States (US), the
Netherlands East Indies and The
first Australian troops landed at 0855 on three beaches: Red, Yellow,
and Green, on a two brigade front just over a mile long. The second wave
quickly followed, landing at 0859. Moments later a red marker,
indicating the location of The RAN Beach Commandos were among the most highly and diversely trained Australian sailors and soldiers of the war; they helped order the confusion of a landing into an organised beachhead. As they were part of a larger army beach group, it could have been expected that the presence of the RAN Commandos may have resented or at least the subject of inter-service rivalry. But based on own its experience with amphibious landings, the Australian army strongly supported the beach commandos and promoted its role. With
no full time regular army and only a small navy, The 1st Australian Beach Group was formed in December 1943. The variety of work required to perform its task is reflected in diverse variety of soldiers who formed the beach group, including: engineers, pioneers, signallers, MPs, support troops, mechanical engineers, and a small medical section – for a total of about 1,800 men including the RAN Commandos.[10] As
Ross Mallet has shown, one of the lessons learnt by the Australian army
from The RAN Beach Commando was formed in January 1944 followed by another commando unit shortly afterwards were established along the same lines as Royal Navy (RN) Beach Commandos. Two months later the 2nd Australian Beach Group was raised and the army asked the navy to provide two more commandos. In November 1944 the four commandos were grouped together as the RAN Beach Unit with Commander R S Pearson who became the Senior Naval Officer Beach Unit (SNOBU). A RAN beach commando unit consisting of 120 officers and ratings, and was about the equivalent of three US Navy beach parties. A beach commando contained a headquarters with a commander, who was the principal beachmaster, in charge of two commando units; a lieutenant commander, who was the deputy principal beachmaster, and three beach parties. Each beach party was controlled by a beachmaster, a lieutenant or lieutenant commander; two assistant beachmasters, and officers and seamen. A beach commando also included a repair and recovery section, a camp party, and a naval beach signals section. The signals section, under the command of a sub lieutenant or midshipman, included signalmen and telegraphists.[12] During an amphibious landing the advance elements of the RAN Commando would go ashore in the first or second waves. Among the advance elements were the two assistant beachmasters. They landed at opposite ends of the beach and carried out a quick reconnaissance of the area looking for suitable landing areas and carefully noting any obstacles in the water or on the shore. They were followed by the beachmasters and the principal beachmaster in the subsequent waves. The beachmaster guided in the later assault waves and the beaching of the larger landing ships and craft. The principal beachmaster located his headquarters near that of the beach group so he could easily be kept up to date with the army’s needs and liase with the US Navy beach parties. The navy signal section worked with the army signallers to establish communications between the sea and the shore, while the principle beachmaster. As a beaching slot became available the principal beachmaster informed the landing craft control officer, a USN officer, who ordered the next ship to make its approach. When the ship was about 1,000 yards away the beachmaster would then guided it in over the radio. These vessels were either brought in according to the pre-arranged timetable worked out when the operation was planned or brought in after consulting the beach group commander. Depending on the beach’s gradient, large pontoons were used to make an improvised ramps or docks. As for the actually unloading, that was left to the soldiers of the beach group.[13] The average age of a sailor in the RAN Commando was early-20s. Many had already been in the RAN for several years, severing on a variety of ships, while others had some experience of combined operations after serving the RN; most had attended Assault. As previously mentioned, Assault was established as a combined operations school. Here sailors were taught general seamanship skills, instructed in navigation and pilotage, boat and landing craft handling, and flotilla work. The shore parties were also instructed on a variety of different small arms and automatic weapons, as well as being instruction in hand-to-hand combat.[14] When
the commandos moved north to join the I Australia Corps this type of
training and instruction continued, and large joint and combined
exercises took place along The close training made the commandos very combatable with their neighbouring army units and visa versa. It did cause, however, complicated command and administration system where responsibility was split between the army and navy. As part an “integral part” of an army beach group, the commandos were “under command” of the beach group’s lieutenant colonel, with the army providing the commandos with their uniforms, weapons, vehicles, equipment, and stores. When on the beach, however, they were under the command of the SNOBU, Commander Pearson, who was also responsible for maintaining navy administration and discipline.[16] To most observers, the RAN Commandos would have appeared to be something of a hybrid unit, one that was part navy and part army. Indeed once he had handed in his navy uniform and hammock for army jungle greens, there was little to distinguish the sailor from the a soldier – apart from his navy cap or badges of rank or rating, and the small “RAN” shoulder flash worn on each arm.[17] In order to maintain their RAN identity, Pearson ordered that wherever possible units were to follow normal naval customs, so the men could wear beards, while the navy’s white ensign was to “worn” on a suitable “mast” near a unit’s headquarters.[18] When
on leave, their mixed appearance caused the commandos problems
particularly from MPs who had never heard of “beach commandos”.[19]Able
Seaman Ernest Tyler remembered being jeered by other servicemen as those
“freaks, those army-navy freaks” ridiculed for being neither “one
thing nor the other.”[20]
Their
greatest source of frustration and resentment though, came from a lack
of action. When a liaison officer from
Rear Admiral Barbey’s headquarters, visited Commandos A and B in
September 1944, he noted the men’s fitness, general smartness and good
manners, but also commented on the “the general desire of the men …
to go into action”.[21]
The men experienced this frustration in different ways. Able Seamen Ted
Jones admitted that while he enjoyed the diverse training, especially
the explosive courses, that was “great fun”, he and his mates become
increasingly bored with the continual training.[22]
Lieutenant Bernard Nelson, however, was far more critical. Nelson had
previously been posted to the RN where he had participated in the Allied
invasions of And
it was a long wait. Since
coming out of In
the next operation, Oboe Six, the rest of the 9th Division landed on
Labuan Island and Brunei Bay in British north Borneo. RAN Beach Commando
A was responsible for landings on Labuan and while Commando B controlled
those at The larger landing ships, such as the Landing Ship, Mediums (LSMs) and LSTs were beached between an hour and two hours behind schedule, while the LSTs were landed in the wrong order and not in accordance with requirements ashore. Some were beached before the ones carrying vehicles required for their unloading and others before the ARC mesh had been laid to enable their vehicles to cross the sand. This experiment in a shared arrangement did not work, being described as a “failure”.[26] There
were no such problems at As
the day progressed As
the land campaign moved further inland and away from the coast and town,
on 4 July Pearson and Morris inspected The
RAN Commandos at But was really necessary to have a RAN unit embedded in an army unit in order for it to work? This was a topic debated at closely at the time. Pearson thought that it was certainly necessary for the navy and army units to train together closely, but was against placing the RAN Commandos under army command. As he saw it the “Commandos job is essentially a naval one and it is most embarrassing for a Principal Beachmaster to have to obey two masters, particularly when one probably does not understand the Naval problems involved.”[29] Similarly, an observer at Tarakan noted that while the navy and army beach units “worked fairly well together” it was “evident that the RAN Commando will never become completely reconciled to a role under army command.”[30] Army though did not see any contradictions. Eventually the major element of an amphibious operational ashore should be under their command and that “no Army commander of any standing would over-ride a Principle Beachmaster on the technical side of his work.”[31] For his own part, Morris felt that “[t]hroughout the operation excellent co-operation existed between Commander, 2nd Australian Beach Group (Colonel G H Hodgson), the DAQMG (Major Collins) and myself.”[32] What is clear though, is that the RAN Commandos are a clear example of the level of sophistication and capabilities that the RAN and Australian army had achieved when conducting amphibious operations. They also demonstrate the army’s willingness to learn for its own experience and those of others, and the versatilely and adaptability of the RAN and its people. The work, training, and sacrifice of the commandos themselves, should not be forgotten.
[1]
VX18229, “Seventh Australian Division at [2]
R P F Nixon, 2/25th Battalion, unpublished manuscript, p 8, Nixon
papers, PR01763, Australian War Memorial (AWM), [3]
“Voyage in time”, unpublished manuscript, p 405, Swan papers,
MSS0861. It was reported later that the navy had “hurled” an
average of one shell or rocket against every 230 square yards of
actual landing beach. Air strikes against [4] Seventeen assault waves, coming ashore in LCVPs landed in the first two hours of the operation, followed by the larger LCMs and LSTs. Notes on amphibious operations SWPA, report on the Balikpapan (Borneo) Operation 1 July 1945, pp 36-37 and Annex 1 to Appendix D, AWM54 item 621/7/52 [5] Vice Admiral Daniel “Uncle Dan” Barbey, Commander of the Seventh Amphibious Force was designated as Commander Balikpapan Attack Force. Rear Admiral A G Noble, commander Amphibious Group Eight, Seventh Fleet, was assigned Commander Balikpapan Attack Group, while Read Admiral R S Riggs was assigned Commander Cruiser Covering Group. Barbey’s attack force consisted of more than 250 vessels. The Amphibious Task Group numbered over 120 ships, including 98 landing craft and miscellaneous vessels, and a protecting screen of ten destroyers, five destroyer escorts, and a frigate. The group as also had a special hydrographic unit. The Cruiser Covering Group consisted of ten cruisers and 14 destroyers. The Escort Carrier Group numbered included three carriers with approximately 90 aircraft, and a screen of one destroyer and five destroyer escorts. Commander Task Group 78.2, Commander Amphibious Group Eight Seventh Fleet Action Report Balikpapan operation, June-July 1945, AWM69, item 19, p I-1; Nial Wheate and Gregory P Gilbert, “Borneo 1945 – An amphibious success story” in Gregory P Gilbert and Robert J Davitt, (eds), Australian Maritime Issues 2005, SPC-A annual: papers in Australian Maritime Affairs no 16, (Canberra: Sea Power Centre, 2005), p 139 [6] Wheate and Gilbert, “Borneo 1945”, p 137; James Golderick, “1941-1945: World War II: The war against Japan” in David Stevens, (ed.), The Royal Australian Navy (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2001), p 149; Peter Stanley, “An Oboe concerto: reflections on the Borneo Landings, 1945” in Glenn Wahlert, (ed.), Australian army amphibious operations in the South-West Pacific: 1942-45: edited papers of the Australian army history conference held at the Australian War Memorial, 15 November 1994, Army Doctrine Centre, 1995, p 135. [7] Address delivered by Trevor K Lloyd, HMAS Assault Association papers, PR00631 [8]
Ross Mallet, “Together again for the first time: the Army, the RAN
and amphibious warfare 1942-45” in David Stevens and John Reeve, (eds),
Sea power ashore and in the
air ( [9] Landing Boats and Crews, 4 August 1942, 3DRL/6643, item 2/53 (2 of 2) [10] Notes on functions, organization and composition of an Aust beach gp, G/175/Ops, 23 July 1944, AWM54, item 721/29/2 [11] Mallet, “Together again for the first time”, p 123 [12] RAN Liaison Officer, Royal Australian Navy Beach Commandos, enclosure A, 2 October 1944, AWM54, item 721/29/20; Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF), Combined operations RAN Beach Commandos (RAAF, 1945), appendix A [13] “Naval Commandos land with invasion troop”, The Australian Women’s Weekly, 16 September 1944, p 20; David Stevens, “Maritime aspects of Australian amphibious operations” in Glenn Wahlert, (ed.) Australian army amphibious operations in the South-West Pacific: 1942-45: edited papers of the Australian army history conference held at the Australian War Memorial, 15 November 1994 (Canberra: Army Doctrine Centre, 1995), pp 120–121 [14] HMAS “Assault” – first year of commission, 1 October 1943, AWM54, item ? [15]
V W Crichton, An eventful
life: the Royal Australian Naval Reserve go to war 1939 – 1945
(Mount Martha: V W Crichton, 1997), p 159; A E Jones, Sailor & commando: a [16] The army beach group was also responsible for recommendations for honours and awards. Command of RAN Beach Unit, G23/1/23, 16 January 1945, AWM54, item 505/3/6 [17]
RAAF, Combined operations [18] Royal Australian Navy Beach Unit, Standing Orders, 1 December 1944, AWM54, item 709/28/1 [20] Ernest Tyler, 1088, AAWFA, http://www.australiansatwarfilmarchive.gov.au/aawfa/ <accessed 1 September 2007> [21] RAN Liaison Officer, Royal Australian Navy Beach Commandos, 2 October 1944, AWM54, item 721/29/20. Such sentiments had been recorded as early as 1943 when the commander of Assault noted that there was a growing feeling among those there that they would be spend the rest of the war in a training establishment. Source? [22] Jones, Sailor & commando, p 54 and p 46 [23] Bernard Nelson, 0572, AAWFA, http://www.australiansatwarfilmarchive.gov.au/aawfa/ <accessed 1 September 2007> [24] SNOBU, Comments on Naval Board’s letter No. 240/1/1707 (034209), AWM54, item 505/3/9 [25]
Morris was recommended for an OBE for his leadership skills and good
judgement display at Tarakan, but the honour was not awarded.
Recommendations for Honours and Rewards. RAN Commando, 2nd
Australian Beach Group, AWM54, item 391/21/3 [26] 2/4 Aust Pnr Bn Be, Beach Bn, Report on Operation Oboe 6; Principle Beachmaster, Commando “A” and “C”, PBM’s report on “Oboe Six”, 6 July 1945, AWM54, item 619/7/32 [27] By 21 July 36,291 personnel, 5,562 vehicles, and 32,127 tonnes of stores were landed under Morris’s and the commando’s direction and control. Report of proceedings of RAN Beach Unit in Operation “Oboe Two”, 7 Aust Division landing at Klandasan near Balikpapan south east Borneo, AWM54, item 505/10/5; Report on Operation Oboe Two, Appendix E, 7 Aust Div Operational Order – Oboe Two, AWM52, item 1/5/14 [28] Signal G0468, I Australia Corps to Land Headquarters, 18 July, 1945, AWM54, item 505/3/9 [29]
SNOBU, Report of proceedings of the RAN Beach Unit in operation
“Oboe Two.” 7 Aust Division landing at near [30] Report on beach organization in Operation Oboe 1 (Tarakan), 23 June 1945, p 15, AWM54, item 617/7/33 [31]
SNOBU, Report of proceedings of the RAN Beach Unit in operation
“Oboe Two.” 7 Aust Division landing at near
|
| Home Mission & Structure Editorial Board Archives Submissions Letters Site Map |
| The Editors International Journal of Naval History editors@ijnhonline.org © Copyright 2009, International Journal of Naval History, All Rights Reserved |
website design by Sunrise Designs, Inc. |