| A Global Forum for Naval
Historical Scholarship |
International Journal of Naval History |
| Home Mission & Structure Editorial Board Archives Submissions Letters Site Map |
|
Previous Page
PDF
David
Fairbank White, Cogswell
Polytechnical College _____________________________________________________________________ The
None
of this is new, of course, and the literature on the Using
this preparation, White has set himself an ambitiously broad task. In
roughly 350 pages he attempts to convey the campaign in its entirety.
Naturally, this leaves little room for more than a fleeting mention of
most of the topics. Indeed, the book has something of a will-o-the-wisp
about it, alighting now here, now there, stopping briefly - usually to
describe in colorful terms some particularly gripping convoy action -
and then moving on. The result is a romp
through the battle that touches on many, perhaps most, of the important
issues. Those reading of these things for the first time stand to gain
an appreciation for the complexity of the battle and a sense of the ebb
and flow of fortunes mirroring the ups and downs of new or improved
weapons, technologies, intelligence sources, vessels, aircraft, tactics
and training. The notes, mostly in bibliographic narrative form, are a
useful introduction to the subject. However, anyone already familiar
with the battle, and seeking a deeper understanding of it, may well be
frustrated for, other than some interviews,
there is little new here. The
book is divided into three main parts: the first covers September 1939
to the summer of 1941 as Britain and Canada struggled alone against the
U-boats; the second brings the U.S. Navy into the fray, with the U-boats
still holding the upper hand; and the third considers the rapid decline
in German fortunes as the Allies’ multifaceted efforts finally come
together from May 1943 onwards. White
is at his best when considering the big picture, for example when he
notes that “On any given day four or five convoys were in motion on
the sea, heading for Although
White’s use of language sometimes helps to convey atmosphere and
immediacy, this reader found his excessive fondness for multiple
adjectives (“the void , vacant, cold, shifting sea,” p.222), his
repetition of colorful descriptions (the convoy system was “groaning
and sagging” on p.174 and then “groaned, sagged and creaked” on
p.177), and his generally flowery prose (88mm deck guns looked as though
they were “conceived by Moloch,” p.176) so annoying that it made
reading this book a chore. It
is, in the end, a journalist’s overview couched in a novelist’s
language based on a solid foundation of research.
|
| Home Mission & Structure Editorial Board Archives Submissions Letters Site Map |
| The Editors International Journal of Naval History editors@ijnhonline.org © Copyright 2010, International Journal of Naval History, All Rights Reserved |
website design by Sunrise Designs, Inc. |